PAX Gold (PAXG): Digital Gold's Safe Haven in the 2025 Crypto Storm

Page 7

‍

CeFi Platforms

‍

CeFi Platforms: Several centralized crypto platforms also support PAXG for trading, custody, and even interest-bearing accounts. For instance, Nexo and YouHodler (crypto lending platforms) have offered interest on PAXG deposits, sometimes advertising yields around 5-8% APY (Get An Instant Paxos Gold Loan - Borrow PAXG Instantly Online) (Earn Free Paxos Gold - Earn yield on Paxos Gold Up to 7%) (these yields come from lending PAXG to others, and rates fluctuate). This indicates that outside of DeFi, traditional crypto lenders see enough demand to borrow PAXG (often from traders or investors who want to short gold or use it for arbitrage) and are willing to pay for it. Centralized brokers like Crypto.com and Bitmart list PAXG, and some even allow credit card purchases of PAXG, simplifying user access. On the institutional side, Prime brokers and OTC desks (Galaxy, Genesis before its issues, etc.) facilitate large PAXG trades, integrating it into their settlement systems just like any other major crypto asset.

Interoperability with Traditional Systems: While PAXG’s primary domain is crypto networks, Paxos has aimed to make it interoperable with traditional gold infrastructure. Their partnership with LPMCL (London Precious Metals Clearing) allows conversion between PAXG and traditional unallocated gold accounts for institutions (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)), bridging digital and legacy systems. Moreover, price discovery for PAXG is directly tied to the global gold price, and arbitrage by market makers ensures PAXG/USD on exchanges aligns with spot gold. In effect, PAXG has become another pathway into the gold market. We can envision future interoperability growth: e.g., integration with COMEX gold futures (perhaps using PAXG as an deliverable asset in crypto-settled gold futures contracts) or with banking apps that might use Paxos’s API to offer gold accounts powered by PAXG under the hood.

Cross-Chain and Future Integration: Currently, PAXG is mostly on Ethereum L1. However, the industry trend is multi-chain. Paxos could deploy PAXG on Ethereum layer-2 networks (like Arbitrum, Polygon) to enable cheaper and faster transactions. They haven’t announced plans yet, possibly because bridging adds complexity and Paxos prioritizes security and regulatory clarity (bridged assets can introduce custodial risk if not done by Paxos itself). Given Paxos’s careful approach, they might wait for layer-2 solutions to mature and possibly get regulatory nods before directly issuing PAXG on them. In the interim, third-party bridges can and have moved small amounts of PAXG to other chains (e.g., users have wrapped PAXG onto Polygon via community bridges, but volume is low). For institutional DeFi on Ethereum, staying on mainnet has been fine since those users tolerate gas costs, but retail adoption at scale might benefit from layer-2 integration in the future.

In summary, PAXG is highly integrated within the crypto ecosystem, functioning like any well-established crypto asset. Its ERC-20 nature gives it plug-and-play compatibility with exchanges, wallets, and smart contracts. Investors can seamlessly include PAXG in multi-asset crypto portfolios, rebalance via DeFi or CeFi platforms, and even use PAXG as a gateway to traditional gold markets through Paxos’s integrations. The interoperability achieved so far means PAXG holders are not siloed – they can interact with the thriving crypto financial system using their tokenized gold just as easily as others might with a stablecoin or Bitcoin. This broad integration enhances PAXG’s utility and value proposition, making it much more than a static token: it’s gold with the freedom of digital finance.

Scalability and Transaction Costs

Scalability for PAXG encompasses both blockchain scalability (throughput, speed, cost of transactions) and the operational scalability (how Paxos can handle growing volumes of gold and users). We will address both.

On the blockchain side, PAXG inherits Ethereum’s current limitations. Ethereum can process roughly 15-30 transactions per second in its base layer (and more now after upgrades, but still limited). PAXG, however, doesn’t come close to hitting those limits in its current usage; the number of PAXG transfers per day is in the low hundreds at most, which is negligible load for Ethereum. Even in extreme scenarios – say thousands of people rush to trade or redeem PAXG simultaneously – Ethereum could handle the token transfers since other network activity would be the main bottleneck, not PAXG specifically. With Ethereum’s ongoing upgrades (proto-danksharding, eventual sharding, etc.), base layer capacity will slowly increase, but more importantly Layer-2 scaling solutions (like rollups) are moving mainstream, which Paxos can leverage if needed. If PAXG usage were to explode (imagine millions of daily users, like a digital gold payments app scenario), Paxos would likely migrate users to a Layer-2 network or sidechain where transfers cost pennies and confirm in seconds, while keeping mainnet for anchoring and finality.

Transaction Speed: On Ethereum, a PAXG transfer typically finalizes in about 1 minute (with ~1 block confirmation needed for practical finality, and Ethereum blocks ~12 seconds, but many platforms wait ~12 blocks ~2-3 minutes for more certainty). This is already faster than traditional gold settlement (which can be T+0 but usually involves some end-of-day processes). From an end-user perspective, moving PAXG is near-instant relative to moving physical gold or even gold ETFs (which trade only during market hours). That said, Ethereum’s variable congestion means sometimes transfers might wait in a pending state if gas price is too low. This is manageable by adjusting gas fees. For institutional flows, Paxos likely batches operations and can pay for higher gas to ensure quick inclusion in blocks.

Transaction Costs: The main drawback of Ethereum is gas fees. Transferring PAXG costs gas like any ERC-20 – roughly 40,000 to 60,000 gas units. If gas price is, say, 50 gwei and ETH is $1,600, that’s about $3-5 per transfer. It could spike to $20+ in very busy periods (like DeFi summer or NFT drops). For large transactions, this cost is trivial (moving $100k of gold for $5 is nothing). But for small retail transactions (moving $50 of PAXG), a $5 fee is 10% – not economical. This is why PAXG isn’t currently used for microtransactions or day-to-day payments (which is fine, it’s not really the target use case right now). If Ethereum gas fees remain high, Paxos may eventually deploy on a more cost-efficient chain or encourage use of an Ethereum Layer-2 where fees might be a few cents.

Paxos actually made a move in 2022 to alleviate user cost: they eliminated the on-chain transfer fee (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)) (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)). Originally, PAXG’s 0.02% fee was taken from each transfer which would have added an additional cost (e.g., transferring $10,000 of PAXG would incur $2 fee to Paxos). Removing this means users only pay the Ethereum network fee now, no additional Paxos fee. Paxos likely did this to improve PAXG’s competitiveness and DeFi integration. Moreover, Paxos at times has covered gas for certain client operations (for example, when institutional clients use the Paxos API to withdraw PAXG to their Ethereum address, Paxos could pre-fund a bit of ETH to that address to cover gas – some stablecoin issuers have done similar for user friendliness). However, this is likely on a limited basis; generally, users need ETH to move PAXG.

Minting/Burning Scalability: On the operational side, Paxos can mint or burn large quantities in single transactions. Ethereum allows large token transfers and supply changes, constrained only by gas. Minting 1 PAXG or 10,000 PAXG has similar transaction cost (just updating a number in the contract). So, technically, Paxos could create large supply batches quickly. They’ve done issuance in chunks of thousands of tokens when needed (the total supply jumped at times by a few thousand in a day when a big client came in). The limiting factor is actually outside the blockchain: obtaining the gold and processing payment. But Paxos has set up efficient processes: wire transfers, gold sourcing in London, etc., which can scale by adding more counterparties or internal traders. Since the gold market is very liquid (typical daily turnover is hundreds of tons ()), Paxos sourcing even a ton (32,000 oz) of gold in a day is feasible without moving the market.

User Scalability and Platform: As more users adopt PAXG, Paxos’s systems for onboarding (KYC/AML) will see more demand. They’ve already onboarded likely tens of thousands of users for PAXG and their other products. They use automated KYC providers and have a compliance team. There’s potential friction here: during surges (like if a viral event caused many sign-ups), Paxos might have delays in verifying new accounts. They could mitigate by increasing staffing or allowing purchase through partner platforms where KYC is already done (like exchanges). This is more of a business scaling point than tech, but worth noting. For current volume, Paxos appears well-scaled – e.g., their support desk can handle the throughput with typically minor delays.

Ethereum 2.0 and Beyond: With Ethereum’s transition to Proof-of-Stake, block times are more consistent (~12 sec) and capacity is a bit better. Future upgrades (danksharding) in a couple years could boost base layer throughput significantly, which would reduce gas fees for everyone, including PAXG transfers. Paxos is likely following Ethereum’s roadmap closely and will adjust strategy if needed (if Ethereum had stagnated on scaling, perhaps Paxos would consider alternative chains; but Ethereum’s path suggests fees will come down and capacity up over time, especially with L2 adoption). Already, a lot of Ethereum activity is moving to L2, which indirectly lowers L1 fees for assets like PAXG that remain on L1 by reducing network competition.

Alternate Networks: Paxos might consider issuing PAXG on other chains like BNB Chain, Avalanche, or Tron if customer demand arises (similar to Tether issuing USDT on multiple chains). But Paxos tends to avoid fragmentation unless necessary, because each additional chain means more reserves management complexity and more smart contracts to secure. They did issue USDP on multiple chains under a wrapped model in partnership with Binance (Binance-Peg tokens). For PAXG, aside from Binance’s peg on BSC, no official multi-chain. If an exchange like Binance wants to list PAXG on their BSC network, they’ll do a wrapped version as they did, which Paxos doesn’t directly manage. That introduces slight counterparty risk (we rely on Binance’s peg being backed 1:1 by real PAXG). Fortunately, the usage of that is tiny.

Throughput vs Traditional Systems: Another angle: how PAXG’s scalability compares to gold ETF systems. Gold ETFs like GLD settle trades in 2 days and creation/redemption of baskets happens in large blocks with certain cut-off times. PAXG is continuously settleable, which is a form of high scalability in time dimension. As long as Ethereum is running, you can settle multiple PAXG transfers within minutes at any time. The bottleneck might be if thousands tried to redeem physical at once – Paxos would have to schedule shipments, etc. But in digital terms, PAXG can handle redemption to USD electronically very fast (next business day ACH or wire).

Conclusion on Scalability: For the near to mid-term, PAXG is sufficiently scalable for expected demand. If millions of retail users needed to move PAXG daily, a layer-2 solution or alternate chain issuance would be warranted and Paxos would need to adapt. They have the technical capability to do so, since bridging to a layer-2 or issuing a new contract isn’t conceptually hard – they would just ensure regulatory approval and that they can manage reserves across networks properly (likely by locking base-layer tokens when issuing layer-2 representations). Gas costs remain the one pain point for small transactions, but for typical use (moving tens of thousands of dollars), it’s acceptable. Paxos’s removal of their own fees shows they are cognizant of the need to minimize friction.

As an investor or user, one should budget for network fees and possibly consider using services (like exchanges or custodians) where internal transfers of PAXG might be off-chain or aggregated to reduce cost. Over time, we expect Paxos to adopt tech improvements in Ethereum and beyond to keep PAXG’s user experience competitive. Already, the timeline for transactions is much faster than traditional gold, and cost for sizable transfers is lower (try moving $1M of gold via armored truck vs. a few dollars in ETH gas!). So PAXG is effectively scalable today for institutional usage; retail micropayments might wait for the next generation of blockchain throughput, but that’s not a significant limitation given gold’s typical use as a store of value rather than a transaction medium.

Redeemability Process and Mechanisms

One of the defining features of PAXG is that it’s redeemable for the underlying asset – either physical gold or fiat currency equivalent. The redemption process is a critical part of the infrastructure, as it enforces the peg and provides an exit mechanism that instills confidence in the token’s value. Let’s detail how redemption works and the systems behind it:

Redeeming for USD (Cash): Any verified Paxos account holder can redeem PAXG tokens for U.S. dollars at the current market price of gold. Operationally, a user would initiate a sell order on Paxos’s platform, sending their PAXG back to Paxos (which triggers a burn of those tokens) and receiving USD in their account. Paxos uses the London gold price (likely LBMA AM/PM fix or a real-time spot index) to determine the payout. According to Paxos’s support materials, this can be done at any time, and Paxos will credit USD typically the same business day or T+1 via wire (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)). This effectively makes PAXG very similar to an ETF – you can always cash out at NAV (minus a small redemption fee). The fee schedule we cited shows up to 0.125% for large redemptions (PAX Gold Fees – Paxos). For example, redeeming $1 million in PAXG might cost $1,250 in fees to Paxos (plus maybe a wire fee), which is competitive with selling physical through a dealer. This process relies on Paxos’s trading desk: when they take in PAXG and pay USD, they likely simultaneously or soon after sell the corresponding gold bar in the market or reassign it to another client. The redemption for USD is very straightforward and has been used often by arbitrageurs who keep PAXG’s price in line – if PAXG ever traded below gold price enough to overcome fees, traders could buy PAXG cheap on exchange and redeem with Paxos for full gold value (profiting the difference). This arbitrage opportunity ensures market price and redemption value converge.

Redeeming for Physical Gold Bars: If a customer holds a large amount of PAXG (minimum 430 PAXG tokens which is about 430 ounces), they have the option to redeem tokens for a full 400 oz LBMA bar (All about PAX Gold (PAXG) | Binance.US Help Center). Why 430 and not 400? The extra 30 tokens act as a buffer to cover the 400 oz bar plus Paxos’s fee and handling – after redemption, Paxos returns any excess in cash or tokens. In practice: a customer makes a redemption request for physical, Paxos identifies which bar(s) correspond to that allocation, and coordinates delivery or pickup. The user would sign some additional documentation (since moving physical gold involves insurance, shipping instructions, perhaps customs if cross-border). Paxos charges fees for this service: likely the same creation/destruction fee of 0.125%-1% depending on size, plus shipping costs which can be significant (shipping a 400 oz bar with full insurance can cost a few thousand dollars depending on distance and security needed). Paxos either arranges for the bar to be made available at the vault for pickup (the user or their agent can go to Brink’s London to collect) or can ship to a designated vault or address. There might also be small fees like conversion of any fractional remainder (if you redeemed 430, you get one 400 oz bar and maybe the value of 30 oz back in cash or smaller gold products).

This process effectively “decouples” the token from the bar – when redeemed, Paxos burns the tokens and instructs Brink’s that bar #XYZ is leaving the Paxos allocated holdings. It then ceases to be part of PAXG reserves. So far, redemption for bars seems rare (likely only a handful of instances, as most find it easier to take cash or use Alpha Bullion for smaller denominations).

Alpha Bullion and Smaller Redemptions: Recognizing not everyone will have 430 oz, Paxos partnered with Alpha Bullion (Bullion Exchanges) to allow redemption of PAXG into smaller gold pieces like 1 oz coins, 10 oz bars, up to 1 kg bars (). The mechanism is that a user sends PAXG to Alpha Bullion (who presumably has a Paxos account or a certain allocation), and Alpha Bullion delivers the requested physical gold product to the user. Alpha Bullion sets their own pricing (likely a premium over spot for small pieces, as is standard in retail gold). The user might effectively “sell” PAXG to Alpha at spot, and pay Alpha for fabrication and delivery of the smaller gold. This option broadens redeemability to even modest holders (e.g., ~1 PAXG for a 1 oz coin, plus fees). It’s a clever way to outsource the logistics of small deliveries so Paxos itself can focus on whole bars and institutional processes.

Process Safeguards: Paxos enforces KYC/AML on redemption. You cannot anonymously show up with PAXG and get gold – you must be the verified owner of the tokens in Paxos’s system. When PAXG moves peer-to-peer on Ethereum, Paxos doesn’t necessarily know who holds it until they come forward for redemption (similar to how a bearer instrument works). When someone wants to redeem, they must create/verify an account if not already done. This ensures compliance (no sanctioned person can redeem into potentially untraceable gold). It’s a security feature as well: if someone stole your tokens, they couldn’t redeem them without passing KYC matching your identity (and likely Paxos would freeze if you report theft).

Redemption Limits: Practically, there might be daily cut-off times. Paxos mentions T+2 for large orders just in case (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)). If someone redeems late on a Friday, funds might go out Monday, etc. For physical, coordination may take days or weeks if international shipping is required. But the request lock-in is immediate upon burning tokens – from that moment, the token holder has a legal claim on either the bar or money, and tokens are destroyed to prevent double use.

Creation (Minting) Process: The flip side of redeemability is minting: when a user wants to create new PAXG by depositing cash or gold. Paxos allows users to deliver unallocated gold from a bullion account in exchange for PAXG (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)) or simply pay cash (USD) for Paxos to purchase gold. For cash, Paxos quotes a rate (spot plus a small fee) and upon payment, mints and delivers PAXG to the user’s Ethereum address. For unallocated gold, Paxos would take delivery into its account at a bullion bank and then allocate it into PAXG reserves, minting tokens. These flexible creation routes mean arbitrageurs and gold traders can easily convert their existing gold positions to PAXG if profitable.

Enforcement of 1:1 Peg via Redemption: Because of these redemption and creation mechanisms, PAXG maintains a tight peg to gold price. If PAXG ever deviated significantly, arbitrage traders (like high-frequency trading firms or market makers) would step in:

• If PAXG < gold value, they’d buy cheap PAXG and redeem it for gold or USD at full value (PAXG, XAUT News: Gold-Pegged Cryptocurrencies Retreat From Records Amid Equity Market Rout).
  
  
• If PAXG > gold, they’d do the reverse: buy gold or gold derivatives and convert to PAXG (by minting via Paxos if they have that capability) and then sell PAXG at the inflated price. These actions are limited by fees (~0.2-0.3% round trip cost), so PAXG usually trades within that band around spot.
  
  

In practice, PAXG has mostly traded at a slight premium of 0–0.5% above spot (PAXG, XAUT News: Gold-Pegged Cryptocurrencies Retreat From Records Amid Equity Market Rout), likely reflecting convenience yield (on-chain gold is a bit more useful than off-chain) and occasional retail buying pressure. But large deviations get corrected quickly by the mechanisms described.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 8: www.thestandard.io/blog/pax-gold-paxg-digital-golds-safe-haven-in-the-2025-crypto-storm-8