Bitcoin (BTC): The Rise of Cryptocurrency in 2025

Bitcoin (BTC): The Rise of Cryptocurrency in 2025
Page 28

3. Regulatory Risk – The Elephant in the Room

Bitcoin's regulatory risk isn’t binary—it’s geopolitical and sectoral.

a) U.S. Landscape:

Bitcoin has been classified as a commodity by the CFTC, exempting it from the SEC's jurisdiction.

However, the IRS treats it as property, leading to complex tax reporting requirements.

Institutional-friendly ETFs (like BlackRock’s IBIT) mark a strong de-risking moment.

b) EU & Asia:

Europe’s MiCA framework supports a clear legal environment.

China remains hostile, banning mining and trading but indirectly participating via offshore OTC activity.

The key risk is policy reversals, unexpected enforcement actions, or taxation regimes, especially in high-adoption countries.

4. Technology & Protocol Risk

Bitcoin’s technology stack is relatively stable, and its Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism has been battle-tested for over a decade. However, risks remain:

Protocol bugs: While rare, a 2018 bug (CVE-2018-17144) could have allowed unlimited coin creation.

Mining centralization: >50% of global hash rate is controlled by a handful of mining pools—posing a centralization attack vector.

Energy reliance: If global ESG policies escalate, PoW mining could become economically unviable in key regions.

Despite these, Bitcoin has shown zero successful protocol breaches in 15 years—an unmatched cybersecurity track record in public blockchains.

Sources:

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2018/09/27/ 

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate 

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com/

5. Systemic Correlation Risk

Traditionally touted as a “non-correlated asset,” Bitcoin has shown increasing correlation with:

Tech equities (NASDAQ) during macro risk-off cycles.

Monetary policy trends—especially during rate hike or quantitative easing cycles.

For instance:

In March 2023, Bitcoin’s correlation with NASDAQ was 0.6, driven by institutional flow alignment.

During inflationary spikes, BTC underperformed gold, undermining the “digital gold” thesis in short timeframes.

Hence, Bitcoin is no longer immune to macro contagion and should be treated as a high-beta liquidity-sensitive asset.

Sources:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/bitcoins-correlation-to-nasdaq-100-reaches-new-high 

https://www.investopedia.com/bitcoin-and-nasdaq-correlation-explained-7481196

6. Custodial and Counterparty Risk

Sophisticated investors must manage custody risk, especially after collapses like:

FTX (2022) and Celsius, where user funds were locked.

Mt. Gox, where poor custody practices led to massive losses.

Mitigation strategies include:

Institutional custody (Fidelity, Anchorage, BitGo)

Multisig wallets (Gnosis, Casa)

Self-custody hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor)

Additionally, insurance coverage, such as that from Lloyd’s of London-backed custodians, is increasingly standard.

Sources:

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com 

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance 

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-56

7. Narrative and Perception Risk

Bitcoin’s value is largely narrative-driven:

“Digital Gold”

“Inflation Hedge”

“Decentralized Freedom Asset”

Should these narratives be invalidated—e.g., through persistent underperformance against inflation, ESG backlash, or the rise of CBDCs—the market may reprice Bitcoin away from being a core macro hedge.

This introduces perception volatility, unlike traditional equities, which are backed by cash flow fundamentals.

Source:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/bitcoin-and-digital-currency-myths-versus-reality/

8. Behavioral Risk – Retail Mania & Whale Dominance

Despite rising institutional presence, BTC markets remain influenced by:

Retail euphoric cycles (e.g., meme rallies, TikTok pumps)

Whale wallet dominance: As of 2024, 2% of wallets control >90% of BTC supply.

Momentum-driven investing, often exacerbated by Twitter-based herd behavior and speculative narratives.

This can amplify volatility, regardless of fundamentals.

Source:

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html 

https://www.blockchaincenter.net/bitcoin-whale-tracking/

9. Tail Risk Scenarios

Such tail risks must be considered in allocation sizing and risk hedging.

10. Risk Mitigation Framework for Institutional Investors

Portfolio Cap: <2–5% core portfolio to absorb volatility.

Hedging: Options-based downside protection via CME BTC derivatives.

Custody: Third-party insured custody only.

Liquidity Planning: Use OTC desks for >$1M allocation flows.

Geographic Allocation Strategy: Hedge regulatory arbitrage risk by diversifying across jurisdictions.

References:

https://charts.coinmetrics.io/network-data

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/11/20/bitcoin-volatility-index-drops-to-record-low-is-it-time-to-buy/

https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/gs-research/bitcoin-institutional-adoption-report.pdf

https://www.cftc.gov/Bitcoin/index.htm

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.micaregulation_202304~fd7d213e76.en.pdf

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2018/09/27/

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com/

https://www.investopedia.com/bitcoin-and-nasdaq-correlation-explained-7481196

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

F. Conclusion (Security and Risks) 

Concluding the Security and Risk Narrative: A Strategic Perspective for Sophisticated Investors

Bitcoin’s journey from a fringe cypherpunk experiment to a globally recognized digital asset has been nothing short of revolutionary. Yet behind this remarkable ascent lies a complex web of risks—some well-known, others hidden beneath the surface—that every sophisticated investor must understand before making a significant allocation decision.

This section aims to synthesize all previously discussed risks into actionable insights and frameworks tailored for venture capital firms, family offices, and institutional asset managers. In doing so, we conclude the security and risk section not just with caution but also with calibrated confidence—highlighting the nuanced balancing act required when investing in Bitcoin.

1. Bitcoin's Security Proposition: The Backbone of Trust

Bitcoin remains the most secure decentralized network ever created. Its cryptographic architecture, fortified by over 15 years of real-world validation and hundreds of exahashes of computational power, is unparalleled in digital systems.

Its lack of a single point of failure, open-source codebase, and global network of nodes means no single nation-state or actor can easily compromise its integrity. Every transaction, once confirmed, is etched permanently in the blockchain ledger—irreversible and publicly auditable.

Institutional players have long questioned whether this security is merely theoretical. But in practice, Bitcoin has weathered:

Global state-level attacks on mining operations (e.g., China’s 2021 mining ban),

Malicious actor interest during geopolitical upheaval (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war usage for censorship-resistant transfers),

And persistent regulatory pressure.

Each time, Bitcoin has emerged stronger, demonstrating what cybersecurity experts consider "anti-fragility"—the more it is tested, the more resilient it becomes.

2. Volatility: A Feature, Not Just a Bug

Volatility has traditionally been viewed as a red flag for institutional investors. But in frontier assets, volatility can also be an opportunity. Sophisticated investors view volatility not as a disqualifier, but as a parameter for position sizing and tactical allocation.

In the case of Bitcoin, its volatility reflects not only its emerging status but also the asymmetry of its return profile. Historically, Bitcoin has outperformed every asset class over every multi-year holding period. That is not to say this will persist indefinitely, but it shifts volatility from being a deterrent to a managed component of a broader risk-reward strategy.

Allocating capital to high-volatility assets like BTC demands:

Long time horizons (5–10 years)

Rebalancing discipline

Tactical derivatives overlay (e.g., protective puts, collars)

Risk-aware investors use these tools not to avoid volatility, but to monetize it.

Sources:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/is-volatility-bad-for-your-portfolio

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/10/18/institutional-investors-embrace-bitcoin-volatility-as-a-feature/

3. Regulatory Headwinds: A Dynamic Threat Landscape

Bitcoin exists in a regulatory paradox: simultaneously seen as an opportunity for financial innovation and a threat to centralized control mechanisms. This duality creates a moving target for risk analysts.

Recent developments—such as the approval of U.S. spot ETFs and Europe's MiCA regulation—have de-risked parts of the narrative. However, Bitcoin is not immune to:

Political overreach (e.g., executive orders)

Tax regime shifts

National currency protectionism

ESG lobbying against energy-intensive mining

Regulatory risks, unlike technical vulnerabilities, are asymmetric. They can be abrupt, jurisdiction-specific, and difficult to hedge. As a result, institutional allocators must diversify not only where they buy and hold BTC but also which legal structures they use to gain exposure—direct custody, ETFs, trusts, or derivative instruments.

Sources:

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-18

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.micaregulation_202304~fd7d213e76.en.pdf

https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/12/crypto-regulation-strategy/

4. Custody and Counterparty Risks: Lessons from Collapse

The FTX and Celsius crises were watershed moments in the maturation of digital asset custody. They underscored a critical truth: decentralized assets require centralized custody frameworks, and failures in these frameworks result in systemic contagion.

What has emerged post-collapse is a bifurcated custody architecture:

Regulated custodians like Fidelity Digital Assets, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo now offer SOC-2 compliance, cold storage, and insurance.

On the retail side, hardware wallet usage has surged, with devices like Ledger Nano X and Trezor Model T becoming household names.

Institutional investors must make custody a first-order concern. The risks of platform insolvency, private key mismanagement, and insurance gaps must be addressed through:

Multi-signature wallets

Redundant backup protocols

Layered access control

Cybersecurity insurance with third-party audit attestation

Sources:

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/insights/custody-matters

https://www.anchorage.com/crypto-custody

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance

5. Liquidity Management: Planning for Unforeseen Conditions

Liquidity in Bitcoin is nuanced. While average daily volumes exceed $20–30 billion, true liquidity is context-dependent. During market panics, the bid side can evaporate rapidly. Conversely, during euphoric phases, market depth becomes distorted by retail speculation.

Institutional exit strategies require:

Pre-negotiated OTC liquidity agreements

Conditional automated sell structures (limit+stop triggers)

Multi-platform diversification (Binance, Kraken, Coinbase Pro, OTC desks)

BTC is liquid in calm markets, but partially illiquid in tail risk moments—much like small-cap equities. Sophisticated investors should not just ask “how much can I buy?” but “how quickly can I exit?”

Sources:

https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/spot

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/institutional-liquidity-strategies-for-crypto-exposure

6. Narrative Fragility: Bitcoin’s Achilles’ Heel?

Bitcoin’s value is not tied to revenue, earnings, or utility—it is tied to belief. The “digital gold” narrative may dominate today, but narratives shift. If Bitcoin fails to:

Hedge inflation consistently

Remain censorship-resistant in a CBDC world

Sustain social sentiment in Web3-native communities

Its valuation premium could erode. For this reason, narrative risk—while non-quantifiable—is existential. Projects with utility models (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) may withstand narrative erosion better than Bitcoin. But paradoxically, Bitcoin’s lack of protocol change is also its greatest strength: a fixed identity in a changing world.

Institutional investors must continually monitor:

Sentiment data

Macro narrative shifts

CBDC adoption rates

ESG pushback trends

7. Final Thoughts: Risk-Adjusted Positioning

Ultimately, Bitcoin’s risk posture is not absolute—it is relative. Relative to what it replaces (fiat debasement hedges, gold, high-beta equities), Bitcoin offers a compelling narrative, an unparalleled technological moat, and an increasingly institutional footprint.

But no risk framework would be complete without humility: Bitcoin is still an experiment. Albeit, the most successful one in digital monetary history.

For institutional portfolios, Bitcoin should be:

Treated as a satellite asset, not a core holding.

Evaluated quarterly, not traded reactively.

Sized conservatively, but watched aggressively.

What’s most important is that the risk doesn’t deter engagement—it informs discipline.

References:

https://bitcoin.org/en/security-guide

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/10/18/institutional-investors-embrace-bitcoin-volatility-as-a-feature/

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/insights/custody-matters

https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/12/crypto-regulation-strategy/

https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/spot

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/institutional-liquidity-strategies-for-crypto-exposure

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/bitcoin-and-digital-currency-myths-versus-reality

https://www.cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-fails-inflation-hedge-narrative

8. Financials & Funding 

A. Fundraising History

“A Currency Born Without a Capital Raise: Bitcoin’s Unconventional Financial Genesis”

In the world of venture investing, most projects undergo multiple funding rounds—seed, Series A, Series B, and beyond—before product-market fit is achieved. Bitcoin, however, presents an anomaly to this institutional logic. Unlike traditional startups or even modern Layer-1 protocols, Bitcoin did not emerge from a boardroom pitch deck or VC-backed whitepaper. Instead, it was launched without a central issuer, founder-led treasury, or any form of fundraising round—a fact that complicates conventional investment analysis but enriches its decentralization thesis.

This section unpacks Bitcoin’s unique capital formation history, detailing its pre-mined genesis block, lack of ICO, emergent capital inflows post-launch, and eventual infrastructure-building efforts through second-layer initiatives and external entities.

1. Genesis Block: Zero Initial Capital, Maximum Philosophical Intent

The Genesis Block (Block 0) of Bitcoin was mined by pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto on January 3, 2009. Unlike most modern crypto assets, Bitcoin launched without:

An Initial Coin Offering (ICO)

Pre-mining for investors

Venture rounds

Private token allocation to insiders

Instead, Satoshi mined the first block themselves, receiving the first 50 BTC reward, which remains unspendable due to a technical quirk. This action, whether intentional or symbolic, laid the foundation for Bitcoin’s narrative as a “fair launch” monetary system, unaffiliated with centralized funding mechanisms.

2. The Emergence of Early Capital (2009–2011): Organic Participation, Not Formal Fundraising

Between 2009 and 2011, Bitcoin development and adoption were largely community-driven, supported by a niche group of technologists, libertarians, and cypherpunks. Notable figures such as Hal Finney, Gavin Andresen, and Martti Malmi contributed code, infrastructure, and thought leadership.

There were no formal investments during this time. Instead, Bitcoin’s “capital formation” took the shape of:

Volunteer development work

Hardware donations (early mining rigs)

Informal OTC trades to acquire BTC for pennies

Infrastructure creation (BitcoinTalk forums, wallet software)

The value of Bitcoin remained near zero until its first recorded transaction on May 22, 2010—when 10,000 BTC were exchanged for two pizzas, now famously known as Bitcoin Pizza Day.

3. Institutional Capital Arrives (2012–2016): Infrastructure Layer, Not Protocol Layer

Since the Bitcoin protocol itself was not “investable” in the traditional startup sense, capital inflows pivoted toward infrastructure players. This included:

Exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Bitstamp)

Wallet providers (Blockchain.com, Electrum)

Custodians (Xapo, BitGo)

Mining hardware firms (Bitmain, Canaan)

These companies became the de facto proxies for VC exposure to Bitcoin.

Notable VC Rounds:

Coinbase (2012 Seed Round): $600K led by Y Combinator

Xapo (2014 Series A): $20M from Benchmark, Greylock

BitGo (2014 Seed): $12M from Redpoint Ventures

While none of these investments granted ownership over Bitcoin itself, they were essential in creating the institutional rails needed for its broader adoption.

4. Institutional Entry Through Investment Vehicles (2013–2020)

As VCs realized they could not “own” Bitcoin’s development pipeline directly, a new class of investment vehicles emerged to allow exposure to BTC price appreciation:

a) Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)

Launched in 2013 by Digital Currency Group (DCG)

Offers indirect exposure to BTC through a publicly traded security

As of 2021, held over 650,000 BTC, making it the largest institutional BTC holder

Source: https://grayscale.com/products/grayscale-bitcoin-trust/

b) Bitcoin Futures on CME (2017)

The launch of regulated BTC futures marked Wall Street’s first major step into the crypto derivatives space.

Created avenues for hedge funds and institutions to take long/short exposure without custody risks.

Sources:

https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin.html

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000119312521193314/d139694d10k.htm

5. Rise of Bitcoin-Focused Funds and Institutional Portfolios (2020–2023)

By 2020, Bitcoin’s narrative had shifted from “payment rail” to “digital store of value.” This attracted new institutional capital through:

MicroStrategy Treasury Allocation (2020): $250M BTC purchase

Tesla BTC Buy (2021): $1.5B BTC purchase

BlackRock, Fidelity, and other asset managers launching Bitcoin ETFs (2023–2024)

These are not fundraising rounds in the conventional sense, but they signal deep-pocket capital allocations, acting as validation for Bitcoin’s institutional investability.

6. Development Funding Through Grants and Open Collective Efforts

With no centralized development entity, Bitcoin Core is funded by:

Non-profit foundations (e.g., Bitcoin Foundation, Brink.dev, HRF)

Donations from crypto firms (e.g., Blockstream, Square Crypto, Chaincode Labs)

Public grant initiatives from VCs and mining firms

There is no cap table, no equity, no token issuance. Development funding is transparently tracked and community-disbursed.

Sources:

https://brink.dev/funding

https://hrf.org/devfund/

https://chaincodelabs.org/grants

7. The Anti-VC Asset Class

Paradoxically, Bitcoin’s lack of a VC-funded origin has become a strength, not a weakness. In an era of token inflation, insider pump-and-dumps, and opaque fundraising rounds, Bitcoin’s grassroots capital formation presents a rare purity.

This has made Bitcoin appealing to:

Family offices seeking long-duration assets without insider manipulation

Macro funds viewing BTC as sovereign-resistant digital real estate

Public treasuries and corporate treasurers as a non-sovereign reserve asset

Bitcoin represents an entirely new archetype: the asset that didn’t raise capital—but raised conviction.

References:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/history-of-bitcoin-pizza-day

https://techcrunch.com/2012/09/11/coinbase-bitcoin/

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/03/13/xapo-raises-20-million-in-first-major-bitcoin-startup-funding-round/

https://grayscale.com/products/grayscale-bitcoin-trust/

https://www.microstrategy.com/en/investor-relations/press/microstrategy-adopts-bitcoin-as-primary-treasury-reserve-asset

https://brink.dev/funding

https://hrf.org/devfund/

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [Email “Coming Soon”]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 29: www.thestandard.io/blog/bitcoin-btc-the-rise-of-cryptocurrency-in-2025-29

6 of the best crypto wallets out there

Vulputate adipiscing in lacus dignissim aliquet sit viverra sed etiam risus nascetur libero ornare non scelerisque est eu faucibus est pretium commodo quisque facilisi dolor enim egestas vel gravida condimentum congue ultricies venenatis aliquet sit.

  • Id at nisl nisl in massa ornare tempus purus pretium ullamcorper cursus
  • Arcu ac eu lacus ut porttitor egesta pulvinar litum suspendisse turpis commodo
  • Dignissim hendrerit sit sollicitudin nam iaculis quis ac malesuada pretium in
  • Sed elementum at at ultricies pellentesque scelerisque elit non eleifend

How to choose the right wallet for your cryptos?

Aliquet sit viverra sed etiam risus nascetur libero ornare non scelerisque est eu faucibus est pretium commodo quisque facilisi dolor enim egestas vel gravida condimentum congue ultricies venenatis aliquet sit quisque quis nibh consequat.

Sed elementum at at ultricies pellentesque scelerisque elit non eleifend

How to ensure the wallet you’re choosing is actually secure?

Integer in id netus magnis facilisis pretium aliquet posuere ipsum arcu viverra et id congue risus ullamcorper eu morbi proin tincidunt blandit tellus in interdum mauris vel ipsum et purus urna gravida bibendum dis senectus eu facilisis pellentesque.

What is the difference from an online wallet vs. a cold wallet?

Integer in id netus magnis facilisis pretium aliquet posuere ipsum arcu viverra et id congue risus ullamcorper eu morbi proin tincidunt blandit tellus in interdum mauris vel ipsum et purus urna gravida bibendum dis senectus eu facilisis pellentesque diam et magna parturient sed. Ultricies blandit a urna eu volutpat morbi lacus.

  1. At at tincidunt eget sagittis cursus vel dictum amet tortor id elementum
  2. Mauris aliquet faucibus iaculis dui vitae ullamco
  3. Gravida mi dolor volutpat et vitae lacus habitasse fames at tempus
  4. Tellus turpis ut neque amet arcu nunc interdum pretium eu fermentum
“Sed eu suscipit varius vestibulum consectetur ullamcorper tincidunt sagittis bibendum id at ut ornare”
Please share with us what is your favorite wallet using #DeFiShow

Tellus a ultrices feugiat morbi massa et ut id viverra egestas sed varius scelerisque risus nunc vitae diam consequat aliquam neque. Odio duis eget faucibus posuere egestas suspendisse id ut  tristique cras ullamcorper nulla iaculis condimentum vitae in facilisis id augue sit ipsum faucibus ut eros cras turpis a risus consectetur amet et mi erat sodales non leo.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Get the latest alpha from us, and the Chainlink build program in an easy-to-read digest with only the best info for the insider.

It's an easy one-click unsub, but I bet you won't; the info is just too good.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.