Page 28

‍

3. Regulatory Risk – The Elephant in the Room

‍

Bitcoin's regulatory risk isn’t binary—it’s geopolitical and sectoral.

‍

a) U.S. Landscape:

‍

Bitcoin has been classified as a commodity by the CFTC, exempting it from the SEC's jurisdiction.

‍

However, the IRS treats it as property, leading to complex tax reporting requirements.

‍

Institutional-friendly ETFs (like BlackRock’s IBIT) mark a strong de-risking moment.

‍

b) EU & Asia:

‍

Europe’s MiCA framework supports a clear legal environment.

‍

China remains hostile, banning mining and trading but indirectly participating via offshore OTC activity.

‍

The key risk is policy reversals, unexpected enforcement actions, or taxation regimes, especially in high-adoption countries.

‍

4. Technology & Protocol Risk

‍

Bitcoin’s technology stack is relatively stable, and its Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism has been battle-tested for over a decade. However, risks remain:

‍

Protocol bugs: While rare, a 2018 bug (CVE-2018-17144) could have allowed unlimited coin creation.

‍

Mining centralization: >50% of global hash rate is controlled by a handful of mining pools—posing a centralization attack vector.

‍

Energy reliance: If global ESG policies escalate, PoW mining could become economically unviable in key regions.

‍

Despite these, Bitcoin has shown zero successful protocol breaches in 15 years—an unmatched cybersecurity track record in public blockchains.

‍

Sources:

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2018/09/27/ 

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate 

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com/

‍

5. Systemic Correlation Risk

‍

Traditionally touted as a “non-correlated asset,” Bitcoin has shown increasing correlation with:

‍

Tech equities (NASDAQ) during macro risk-off cycles.

‍

Monetary policy trends—especially during rate hike or quantitative easing cycles.

‍

For instance:

‍

In March 2023, Bitcoin’s correlation with NASDAQ was 0.6, driven by institutional flow alignment.

‍

During inflationary spikes, BTC underperformed gold, undermining the “digital gold” thesis in short timeframes.

‍

Hence, Bitcoin is no longer immune to macro contagion and should be treated as a high-beta liquidity-sensitive asset.

‍

Sources:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/bitcoins-correlation-to-nasdaq-100-reaches-new-high 

https://www.investopedia.com/bitcoin-and-nasdaq-correlation-explained-7481196

‍

6. Custodial and Counterparty Risk

‍

Sophisticated investors must manage custody risk, especially after collapses like:

‍

FTX (2022) and Celsius, where user funds were locked.

‍

Mt. Gox, where poor custody practices led to massive losses.

‍

Mitigation strategies include:

‍

Institutional custody (Fidelity, Anchorage, BitGo)

‍

Multisig wallets (Gnosis, Casa)

‍

Self-custody hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor)

‍

Additionally, insurance coverage, such as that from Lloyd’s of London-backed custodians, is increasingly standard.

‍

Sources:

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com 

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance 

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-56

‍

7. Narrative and Perception Risk

‍

Bitcoin’s value is largely narrative-driven:

‍

“Digital Gold”

‍

“Inflation Hedge”

‍

“Decentralized Freedom Asset”

‍

Should these narratives be invalidated—e.g., through persistent underperformance against inflation, ESG backlash, or the rise of CBDCs—the market may reprice Bitcoin away from being a core macro hedge.

‍

This introduces perception volatility, unlike traditional equities, which are backed by cash flow fundamentals.

‍

Source:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/bitcoin-and-digital-currency-myths-versus-reality/

‍

8. Behavioral Risk – Retail Mania & Whale Dominance

‍

Despite rising institutional presence, BTC markets remain influenced by:

‍

Retail euphoric cycles (e.g., meme rallies, TikTok pumps)

‍

Whale wallet dominance: As of 2024, 2% of wallets control >90% of BTC supply.

‍

Momentum-driven investing, often exacerbated by Twitter-based herd behavior and speculative narratives.

‍

This can amplify volatility, regardless of fundamentals.

‍

Source:

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html 

https://www.blockchaincenter.net/bitcoin-whale-tracking/

‍

9. Tail Risk Scenarios

‍

Such tail risks must be considered in allocation sizing and risk hedging.

‍

10. Risk Mitigation Framework for Institutional Investors

‍

Portfolio Cap: <2–5% core portfolio to absorb volatility.

‍

Hedging: Options-based downside protection via CME BTC derivatives.

‍

Custody: Third-party insured custody only.

‍

Liquidity Planning: Use OTC desks for >$1M allocation flows.

‍

Geographic Allocation Strategy: Hedge regulatory arbitrage risk by diversifying across jurisdictions.

‍

References:

‍

https://charts.coinmetrics.io/network-data

‍

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/11/20/bitcoin-volatility-index-drops-to-record-low-is-it-time-to-buy/

‍

https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/gs-research/bitcoin-institutional-adoption-report.pdf

‍

https://www.cftc.gov/Bitcoin/index.htm

‍

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.micaregulation_202304~fd7d213e76.en.pdf

‍

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2018/09/27/

‍

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate

‍

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com/

‍

https://www.investopedia.com/bitcoin-and-nasdaq-correlation-explained-7481196

‍

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com

‍

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance

‍

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

‍

F. Conclusion (Security and Risks) 

‍

Concluding the Security and Risk Narrative: A Strategic Perspective for Sophisticated Investors

‍

Bitcoin’s journey from a fringe cypherpunk experiment to a globally recognized digital asset has been nothing short of revolutionary. Yet behind this remarkable ascent lies a complex web of risks—some well-known, others hidden beneath the surface—that every sophisticated investor must understand before making a significant allocation decision.

‍

This section aims to synthesize all previously discussed risks into actionable insights and frameworks tailored for venture capital firms, family offices, and institutional asset managers. In doing so, we conclude the security and risk section not just with caution but also with calibrated confidence—highlighting the nuanced balancing act required when investing in Bitcoin.

‍

1. Bitcoin's Security Proposition: The Backbone of Trust

‍

Bitcoin remains the most secure decentralized network ever created. Its cryptographic architecture, fortified by over 15 years of real-world validation and hundreds of exahashes of computational power, is unparalleled in digital systems.

‍

Its lack of a single point of failure, open-source codebase, and global network of nodes means no single nation-state or actor can easily compromise its integrity. Every transaction, once confirmed, is etched permanently in the blockchain ledger—irreversible and publicly auditable.

‍

Institutional players have long questioned whether this security is merely theoretical. But in practice, Bitcoin has weathered:

‍

Global state-level attacks on mining operations (e.g., China’s 2021 mining ban),

‍

Malicious actor interest during geopolitical upheaval (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war usage for censorship-resistant transfers),

‍

And persistent regulatory pressure.

‍

Each time, Bitcoin has emerged stronger, demonstrating what cybersecurity experts consider "anti-fragility"—the more it is tested, the more resilient it becomes.

‍

2. Volatility: A Feature, Not Just a Bug

‍

Volatility has traditionally been viewed as a red flag for institutional investors. But in frontier assets, volatility can also be an opportunity. Sophisticated investors view volatility not as a disqualifier, but as a parameter for position sizing and tactical allocation.

‍

In the case of Bitcoin, its volatility reflects not only its emerging status but also the asymmetry of its return profile. Historically, Bitcoin has outperformed every asset class over every multi-year holding period. That is not to say this will persist indefinitely, but it shifts volatility from being a deterrent to a managed component of a broader risk-reward strategy.

‍

Allocating capital to high-volatility assets like BTC demands:

‍

Long time horizons (5–10 years)

‍

Rebalancing discipline

‍

Tactical derivatives overlay (e.g., protective puts, collars)

‍

Risk-aware investors use these tools not to avoid volatility, but to monetize it.

‍

Sources:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/is-volatility-bad-for-your-portfolio

‍

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/10/18/institutional-investors-embrace-bitcoin-volatility-as-a-feature/

‍

3. Regulatory Headwinds: A Dynamic Threat Landscape

‍

Bitcoin exists in a regulatory paradox: simultaneously seen as an opportunity for financial innovation and a threat to centralized control mechanisms. This duality creates a moving target for risk analysts.

‍

Recent developments—such as the approval of U.S. spot ETFs and Europe's MiCA regulation—have de-risked parts of the narrative. However, Bitcoin is not immune to:

‍

Political overreach (e.g., executive orders)

‍

Tax regime shifts

‍

National currency protectionism

‍

ESG lobbying against energy-intensive mining

‍

Regulatory risks, unlike technical vulnerabilities, are asymmetric. They can be abrupt, jurisdiction-specific, and difficult to hedge. As a result, institutional allocators must diversify not only where they buy and hold BTC but also which legal structures they use to gain exposure—direct custody, ETFs, trusts, or derivative instruments.

‍

Sources:

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-18

‍

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.micaregulation_202304~fd7d213e76.en.pdf

‍

https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/12/crypto-regulation-strategy/

‍

4. Custody and Counterparty Risks: Lessons from Collapse

‍

The FTX and Celsius crises were watershed moments in the maturation of digital asset custody. They underscored a critical truth: decentralized assets require centralized custody frameworks, and failures in these frameworks result in systemic contagion.

‍

What has emerged post-collapse is a bifurcated custody architecture:

‍

Regulated custodians like Fidelity Digital Assets, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo now offer SOC-2 compliance, cold storage, and insurance.

‍

On the retail side, hardware wallet usage has surged, with devices like Ledger Nano X and Trezor Model T becoming household names.

‍

Institutional investors must make custody a first-order concern. The risks of platform insolvency, private key mismanagement, and insurance gaps must be addressed through:

‍

Multi-signature wallets

‍

Redundant backup protocols

‍

Layered access control

‍

Cybersecurity insurance with third-party audit attestation

‍

Sources:

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/insights/custody-matters

‍

https://www.anchorage.com/crypto-custody

‍

https://www.bitgo.com/insurance

‍

5. Liquidity Management: Planning for Unforeseen Conditions

‍

Liquidity in Bitcoin is nuanced. While average daily volumes exceed $20–30 billion, true liquidity is context-dependent. During market panics, the bid side can evaporate rapidly. Conversely, during euphoric phases, market depth becomes distorted by retail speculation.

‍

Institutional exit strategies require:

‍

Pre-negotiated OTC liquidity agreements

‍

Conditional automated sell structures (limit+stop triggers)

‍

Multi-platform diversification (Binance, Kraken, Coinbase Pro, OTC desks)

‍

BTC is liquid in calm markets, but partially illiquid in tail risk moments—much like small-cap equities. Sophisticated investors should not just ask “how much can I buy?” but “how quickly can I exit?”

‍

Sources:

https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/spot

‍

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/institutional-liquidity-strategies-for-crypto-exposure

‍

6. Narrative Fragility: Bitcoin’s Achilles’ Heel?

‍

Bitcoin’s value is not tied to revenue, earnings, or utility—it is tied to belief. The “digital gold” narrative may dominate today, but narratives shift. If Bitcoin fails to:

‍

Hedge inflation consistently

‍

Remain censorship-resistant in a CBDC world

‍

Sustain social sentiment in Web3-native communities

‍

Its valuation premium could erode. For this reason, narrative risk—while non-quantifiable—is existential. Projects with utility models (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) may withstand narrative erosion better than Bitcoin. But paradoxically, Bitcoin’s lack of protocol change is also its greatest strength: a fixed identity in a changing world.

‍

Institutional investors must continually monitor:

‍

Sentiment data

‍

Macro narrative shifts

‍

CBDC adoption rates

‍

ESG pushback trends

‍

7. Final Thoughts: Risk-Adjusted Positioning

‍

Ultimately, Bitcoin’s risk posture is not absolute—it is relative. Relative to what it replaces (fiat debasement hedges, gold, high-beta equities), Bitcoin offers a compelling narrative, an unparalleled technological moat, and an increasingly institutional footprint.

‍

But no risk framework would be complete without humility: Bitcoin is still an experiment. Albeit, the most successful one in digital monetary history.

‍

For institutional portfolios, Bitcoin should be:

‍

Treated as a satellite asset, not a core holding.

‍

Evaluated quarterly, not traded reactively.

‍

Sized conservatively, but watched aggressively.

‍

What’s most important is that the risk doesn’t deter engagement—it informs discipline.

‍

References:

‍

https://bitcoin.org/en/security-guide

‍

https://www.cambridgebitcoinelectricityconsumption.com

‍

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/10/18/institutional-investors-embrace-bitcoin-volatility-as-a-feature/

‍

https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/insights/custody-matters

‍

https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/12/crypto-regulation-strategy/

‍

https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/spot

‍

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/institutional-liquidity-strategies-for-crypto-exposure

‍

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/bitcoin-and-digital-currency-myths-versus-reality

‍

https://www.cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-fails-inflation-hedge-narrative

‍

‍

Financials & Funding 

A. Fundraising History

‍

“A Currency Born Without a Capital Raise: Bitcoin’s Unconventional Financial Genesis”

‍

In the world of venture investing, most projects undergo multiple funding rounds—seed, Series A, Series B, and beyond—before product-market fit is achieved. Bitcoin, however, presents an anomaly to this institutional logic. Unlike traditional startups or even modern Layer-1 protocols, Bitcoin did not emerge from a boardroom pitch deck or VC-backed whitepaper. Instead, it was launched without a central issuer, founder-led treasury, or any form of fundraising round—a fact that complicates conventional investment analysis but enriches its decentralization thesis.

‍

This section unpacks Bitcoin’s unique capital formation history, detailing its pre-mined genesis block, lack of ICO, emergent capital inflows post-launch, and eventual infrastructure-building efforts through second-layer initiatives and external entities.

‍

1. Genesis Block: Zero Initial Capital, Maximum Philosophical Intent

‍

The Genesis Block (Block 0) of Bitcoin was mined by pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto on January 3, 2009. Unlike most modern crypto assets, Bitcoin launched without:

‍

An Initial Coin Offering (ICO)

‍

Pre-mining for investors

‍

Venture rounds

‍

Private token allocation to insiders

‍

Instead, Satoshi mined the first block themselves, receiving the first 50 BTC reward, which remains unspendable due to a technical quirk. This action, whether intentional or symbolic, laid the foundation for Bitcoin’s narrative as a “fair launch” monetary system, unaffiliated with centralized funding mechanisms.

‍

2. The Emergence of Early Capital (2009–2011): Organic Participation, Not Formal Fundraising

‍

Between 2009 and 2011, Bitcoin development and adoption were largely community-driven, supported by a niche group of technologists, libertarians, and cypherpunks. Notable figures such as Hal Finney, Gavin Andresen, and Martti Malmi contributed code, infrastructure, and thought leadership.

‍

There were no formal investments during this time. Instead, Bitcoin’s “capital formation” took the shape of:

‍

Volunteer development work

‍

Hardware donations (early mining rigs)

‍

Informal OTC trades to acquire BTC for pennies

‍

Infrastructure creation (BitcoinTalk forums, wallet software)

‍

The value of Bitcoin remained near zero until its first recorded transaction on May 22, 2010—when 10,000 BTC were exchanged for two pizzas, now famously known as Bitcoin Pizza Day.

‍

3. Institutional Capital Arrives (2012–2016): Infrastructure Layer, Not Protocol Layer

‍

Since the Bitcoin protocol itself was not “investable” in the traditional startup sense, capital inflows pivoted toward infrastructure players. This included:

‍

Exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Bitstamp)

‍

Wallet providers (Blockchain.com, Electrum)

‍

Custodians (Xapo, BitGo)

‍

Mining hardware firms (Bitmain, Canaan)

‍

These companies became the de facto proxies for VC exposure to Bitcoin.

‍

Notable VC Rounds:

‍

Coinbase (2012 Seed Round): $600K led by Y Combinator

‍

Xapo (2014 Series A): $20M from Benchmark, Greylock

‍

BitGo (2014 Seed): $12M from Redpoint Ventures

‍

While none of these investments granted ownership over Bitcoin itself, they were essential in creating the institutional rails needed for its broader adoption.

‍

4. Institutional Entry Through Investment Vehicles (2013–2020)

‍

As VCs realized they could not “own” Bitcoin’s development pipeline directly, a new class of investment vehicles emerged to allow exposure to BTC price appreciation:

‍

a) Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)

‍

Launched in 2013 by Digital Currency Group (DCG)

‍

Offers indirect exposure to BTC through a publicly traded security

‍

As of 2021, held over 650,000 BTC, making it the largest institutional BTC holder

Source: https://grayscale.com/products/grayscale-bitcoin-trust/

‍

b) Bitcoin Futures on CME (2017)

‍

The launch of regulated BTC futures marked Wall Street’s first major step into the crypto derivatives space.

‍

Created avenues for hedge funds and institutions to take long/short exposure without custody risks.

‍

Sources:

https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin.html

‍

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000119312521193314/d139694d10k.htm

‍

5. Rise of Bitcoin-Focused Funds and Institutional Portfolios (2020–2023)

‍

By 2020, Bitcoin’s narrative had shifted from “payment rail” to “digital store of value.” This attracted new institutional capital through:

‍

MicroStrategy Treasury Allocation (2020): $250M BTC purchase

‍

Tesla BTC Buy (2021): $1.5B BTC purchase

‍

BlackRock, Fidelity, and other asset managers launching Bitcoin ETFs (2023–2024)

‍

These are not fundraising rounds in the conventional sense, but they signal deep-pocket capital allocations, acting as validation for Bitcoin’s institutional investability.

‍

6. Development Funding Through Grants and Open Collective Efforts

‍

With no centralized development entity, Bitcoin Core is funded by:

‍

Non-profit foundations (e.g., Bitcoin Foundation, Brink.dev, HRF)

‍

Donations from crypto firms (e.g., Blockstream, Square Crypto, Chaincode Labs)

‍

Public grant initiatives from VCs and mining firms

‍

There is no cap table, no equity, no token issuance. Development funding is transparently tracked and community-disbursed.

‍

Sources:

https://brink.dev/funding

‍

https://hrf.org/devfund/

‍

https://chaincodelabs.org/grants

‍

7. The Anti-VC Asset Class

‍

Paradoxically, Bitcoin’s lack of a VC-funded origin has become a strength, not a weakness. In an era of token inflation, insider pump-and-dumps, and opaque fundraising rounds, Bitcoin’s grassroots capital formation presents a rare purity.

‍

This has made Bitcoin appealing to:

‍

Family offices seeking long-duration assets without insider manipulation

‍

Macro funds viewing BTC as sovereign-resistant digital real estate

‍

Public treasuries and corporate treasurers as a non-sovereign reserve asset

‍

Bitcoin represents an entirely new archetype: the asset that didn’t raise capital—but raised conviction.

‍

References:

‍

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block

‍

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/history-of-bitcoin-pizza-day

‍

https://techcrunch.com/2012/09/11/coinbase-bitcoin/

‍

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/03/13/xapo-raises-20-million-in-first-major-bitcoin-startup-funding-round/

‍

https://grayscale.com/products/grayscale-bitcoin-trust/

‍

https://www.microstrategy.com/en/investor-relations/press/microstrategy-adopts-bitcoin-as-primary-treasury-reserve-asset

‍

https://brink.dev/funding

‍

https://hrf.org/devfund/

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [Email “Coming Soon”]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 29: www.thestandard.io/blog/bitcoin-btc-the-rise-of-cryptocurrency-in-2025-29